/
/
Business Process Re-engineering
Expert Service
Shivanath Devinarayanan
Transform your operations through strategic process optimization and automation for sustainable business growth.
On this page
Common Challenges
- • Outdated and inefficient workflows
- • Redundant processes causing delays
- • Poor scalability of current operations
- • Lack of process standardization
Our Approach
1. Process Mapping
Walk the real path, not the diagram. Most drain lives in the long tail: vendor portals, exception queues, a dashboard only three people understand, a Slack thread that never became a workflow. Map who delegates, who reviews, and who owns each step before you pick a tool.
2. Redesign & Automation
Decide whether the work needs a cleaner API or a better operator. Structured, permissioned, repeatable work belongs on connectors and MCP. Messy screens belong on computer-use only after you name the override and the audit trail. BCG's split still holds: most of the outcome is people and process, not the model.
3. Performance Monitoring
Track incidents caught in hours versus debriefs six months later. AT&T's published agent design logs every action and keeps a human on the chain reaction. If you cannot name the reviewer, the process is not ready to scale.
What should you automate, and what should stay human?
For a decade, enterprise automation assumed the system had to expose a clean interface first. API first. Connector first. If the vendor did not cooperate, the work stayed human. Computer-use agents change that bargain: if the software has a screen, an agent may be able to operate it. That is useful on the long tail. It is also how you automate the wrong return policy at 10,000-query volume if review is a checkbox.
The operating question is simple. Does this workflow need a cleaner integration, or a better operator? Claude-style MCP rails win when the world cooperates. Codex-style computer use has reach when it does not. Either way, Delegate, Review, Own still applies: identity and scope, a person who can override, and a named owner when the agent is wrong.
ServiceNow published the pattern in the other direction. Agents took 90% of IT service-desk volume. Kellie Romack reskilled 85% of that desk into judgment work. The process change was the product. The model was the tool.
Key Benefits
- A map of the work people actually do, including the screens nobody documented
- Automation only where identity, review, and ownership are named
- A review cadence that treats process change as operating work
- A path that scales without adding a parallel shadow process
Home · About · Services · Portfolio · Success Stories · Writing · News · Events · Contact · Tools I use · Media kit · Privacy Policy